The case could have a broad impact on how the First Amendment is applied in other trademark cases.
Why? Can’t we accept free speech? As it is? “FREE SPEECH?”
The patient office was scared “SHITLESS” about “who do/would we offend?
There is a split! Between free speech and crossing the invisible line of “political correctness”.
This decision will have such implications. There will be many cases of: “what line(s) do we cross?” VS. “who do we offend?”
this will not be the first! Or the last! to come.